Lisbeth Sachs
Impact in
- Pharmacy top 5%
Papers in
-
- Risk Perception and Management 9
- Co-authors
- Carol Tishelman (10 shared papers)Viveka Adelswärd (7 shared papers)Göran Tomson (2 shared papers)Adam Taube (3 shared papers)Catarina Widmark (5 shared papers)Lars‐Christer Hydén (1 shared paper)Vinod Diwan (2 shared papers)Ingela Krantz (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Social Science & Medicine (5 papers)Psycho-Oncology (4 papers)Sociology of Health & Illness (3 papers)Qualitative Health Research (2 papers)Acta Oncologica (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwedenUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Lisbeth Sachs
53 papers receiving 844 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 32
- Pharmacy 46
- General Health Professions 246
- Research and Theory 7
- Health 47
Countries citing papers authored by Lisbeth Sachs
This map shows the geographic impact of Lisbeth Sachs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisbeth Sachs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisbeth Sachs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lisbeth Sachs
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisbeth Sachs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisbeth Sachs. The network helps show where Lisbeth Sachs may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Lisbeth Sachs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 73 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 71 | |
| 3 | 1992 | 58 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 52 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 49 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 46 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 44 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 44 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 41 | |
| 10 | Evil eye or bacteria: Turkish migrant women and Swedish health care | 1983 | 41 |
| 11 | 1998 | 30 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 30 | |
| 13 | 1989 | 29 | |
| 14 | 1998 | 28 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 26 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 26 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 24 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 23 | |
| 19 | 1996 | 22 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 20 |
About Lisbeth Sachs
Lisbeth Sachs is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Education, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Social Psychology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 958 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Risk Perception and Management (9 papers), Social and Educational Sciences (9 papers), Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research (4 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (4 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers) and Research in Social Sciences (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (32 citations), Pharmacy (46 citations), General Health Professions (246 citations), Research and Theory (7 citations) and Health (47 citations). Lisbeth Sachs has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Carol Tishelman, Viveka Adelswärd, Göran Tomson, Adam Taube, Catarina Widmark, Lars‐Christer Hydén, Vinod Diwan, Ingela Krantz, Tore Nilstun and Per Linell. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Psycho-Oncology, Sociology of Health & Illness, Qualitative Health Research and Acta Oncologica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.