Lisbeth Prætorius

1.0k citations
35 papers · 587 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Lisbeth Prætorius

30 papers receiving 577 citations

Peers

Lisbeth Prætorius
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Reproductive Medicine 455
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 266
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 347
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 41
  • Immunology 60
Replace Franca Agresta with:
Franca Agresta Australia
K. Friol Germany
A. Lewin Israel
M. Quinn United States
S.J. Chantilis United States
Lora K. Shahine United States
Barbara Grzechocińska Poland
R. Boostanfar United States
Rebecca Moffat Switzerland
Sasmira Lalwani United States
Lisbeth Prætorius relative to Franca Agresta Australia Franca Agresta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Franca Agresta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisbeth Prætorius

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisbeth Prætorius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisbeth Prætorius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisbeth Prætorius more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisbeth Prætorius

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisbeth Prætorius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisbeth Prætorius. The network helps show where Lisbeth Prætorius may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lisbeth Prætorius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lisbeth Prætorius Line = papers co-authored together Lisbeth Prætorius links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016115
2 2017102
3 201693
4 202084
5 201932
6 201728
7 201826
8 200216
9 202012
10 201711
11 201910
12 20208
13 20247
14 20196
15 20215
16 20254
17 20174
18 20233
19 20223
20 20232

About Lisbeth Prætorius

Lisbeth Prætorius is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Hematology and Microbiology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 587 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian function and disorders (19 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (15 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (13 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (10 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (5 papers), Blood groups and transfusion (3 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (3 papers) and Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (455 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (266 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (347 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (41 citations) and Immunology (60 citations). Lisbeth Prætorius has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Sweden and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Anja Pinborg, Kristine Løssl, Anne Zedeler, Jeanette Bogstad, M. Toftager, Thue Bryndorf, Lisbeth Nilas, Lone Schmidt, Jørgen Holm Petersen and Anders Nyboe Andersen. Their work appears in journals such as Human Reproduction, Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, BMJ Open and European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact