Lisbeth Bjerring Jensen

13 papers receiving 512 citations

Peers

Lisbeth Bjerring Jensen
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 328
  • Immunology 72
  • Surgery 138
  • Molecular Biology 191
  • Pharmacology 41
Replace Toshitsugu Kariya with:
Toshitsugu Kariya Japan
S Ohtaki Japan
Elisabeth Pook Germany
Dennis M. Hawley United States
Tania Kastelic Switzerland
R. Michael Williams United States
Bram Blomme Belgium
Roger Lachance Canada
T E Romer Poland
Tatsuo Shinagawa United States
Lisbeth Bjerring Jensen relative to Toshitsugu Kariya Japan Toshitsugu Kariya's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Toshitsugu Kariya · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisbeth Bjerring Jensen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisbeth Bjerring Jensen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisbeth Bjerring Jensen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisbeth Bjerring Jensen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisbeth Bjerring Jensen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisbeth Bjerring Jensen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisbeth Bjerring Jensen. The network helps show where Lisbeth Bjerring Jensen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lisbeth Bjerring Jensen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lisbeth Bjerring Jensen Line = papers co-authored together Lisbeth Bjerring Jensen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2002243
2 200289
3 201372
4 200055
5 201529
6 199417
7 199312
8 199212
9 19917
10 20075
11 20165
12 19834
13 19943

About Lisbeth Bjerring Jensen

Lisbeth Bjerring Jensen is a scholar working on Immunology, Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Surgery, having authored 13 papers that have together received 553 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complement system in diseases (4 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers), Protein purification and stability (2 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (2 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (1 paper), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (1 paper) and Mosquito-borne diseases and control (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (328 citations), Immunology (72 citations), Surgery (138 citations), Molecular Biology (191 citations) and Pharmacology (41 citations). Lisbeth Bjerring Jensen has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Milan Zdravković, Vibeke Hatorp, Paul Rolan, Henrik Agersø, Jeppe Sturis, Grethe Jakobsen, Søren Erik Larsen, Claus Koch, Lennart Andersen and Declan Walsh. Their work appears in journals such as Vox Sanguinis, Fish & Shellfish Immunology, Diabetes Care, Thrombosis and Haemostasis and Journal of Immunological Methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact