Ling‐Jun Li

2.3k citations
113 papers · 1.7k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Ling‐Jun Li

100 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Ling‐Jun Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 308
  • Ophthalmology 188
  • Hepatology 120
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 222
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 175
Replace Weihua Gao with:
Weihua Gao United States
Marta Alves Portugal
Eytan Cohen Israel
Stefano Federico Italy
Katri Puukka Finland
Kaiming Wang Canada
Xintong Li China
Tatsuhiko Urakami Japan
C Augood United Kingdom
Dina Ragab Egypt
Ling‐Jun Li relative to Weihua Gao United States Weihua Gao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Weihua Gao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ling‐Jun Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ling‐Jun Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ling‐Jun Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ling‐Jun Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ling‐Jun Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ling‐Jun Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ling‐Jun Li. The network helps show where Ling‐Jun Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ling‐Jun Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ling‐Jun Li Line = papers co-authored together Ling‐Jun Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 113 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015103
2 201281
3 202166
4 201960
5 202054
6 201853
7 201851
8 201548
9 201747
10 201943
11 201842
12 201142
13 201041
14 201240
15 201835
16 201534
17 201828
18 201726
19 201125
20 202024

About Ling‐Jun Li

Ling‐Jun Li is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 113 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Birth, Development, and Health (25 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (23 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (19 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (11 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (7 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (6 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (4 papers) and Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (308 citations), Ophthalmology (188 citations), Hepatology (120 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (222 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (175 citations). Ling‐Jun Li has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Tien Yin Wong, Izzuddin M. Aris, Marie‐France Hivert, Emily Oken, Ecosse L. Lamoureux, Sheryl L. Rifas‐Shiman, Ryan Eyn Kidd Man, Kok Hian Tan, Yap Seng Chong and M. Kamran Ikram. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Endocrinology, Scientific Reports, PLoS ONE, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and Nutrients.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact