Line Melby

54 papers receiving 531 citations

Peers

Line Melby
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 11
  • Health Information Management 43
  • General Health Professions 149
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 19
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 8
Replace Martina A. Clarke with:
Martina A. Clarke United States
Linda A Treiber United States
Kristina L. Guo United States
Tor Inge Romøren Norway
Elizabeth Hart United Kingdom
Aud Obstfelder Norway
C J Bland United States
Theo Niessen Netherlands
Nancy Fjortoft United States
Henriette Langstrup Denmark
Line Melby relative to Martina A. Clarke United States Martina A. Clarke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Martina A. Clarke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Line Melby

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Line Melby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Line Melby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Line Melby more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Line Melby

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Line Melby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Line Melby. The network helps show where Line Melby may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Line Melby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Line Melby Line = papers co-authored together Line Melby links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201860
2 201944
3 196741
4 201540
5 201433
6 201723
7 201722
8 201320
9 201319
10 201118
11 201818
12 201917
13 201917
14 201017
15 202213
16 202111
17 201511
18 202110
19 201510
20 20069

About Line Melby

Line Melby is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health Information Management, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 61 papers that have together received 580 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (10 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (5 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (5 papers), Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (11 citations), Health Information Management (43 citations), General Health Professions (149 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (19 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (8 citations). Line Melby has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Denmark and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Ragnhild Hellesø, Aud Obstfelder, Donald R. Strobach, Pieter J. Toussaint, Jannike Kaasbøll, Anders Grimsmo, Veronika Paulsen, Sissel Steihaug, Bård Paulsen and Marian Ådnanes. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Integrated Care, International Journal of Medical Informatics, BMC Health Services Research, European Journal of Public Health and Journal of Clinical Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact