Linda M. Wright

555 citations
8 papers · 148 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Linda M. Wright

8 papers receiving 134 citations

Peers

Linda M. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Equine 47
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 90
  • Small Animals 28
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 63
  • Endocrinology 7
Replace Nicky Van Der Vekens with:
Nicky Van Der Vekens Belgium
Jan‐Gerd Kresken Germany
M. Perego Italy
Kirstie A. Barrett United States
L. Ham Netherlands
Martin Dolgin United States
Helmut Baumgartner Austria
Mirza Husic Denmark
Samantha Loeber United States
Stéphane Delepine France
Linda M. Wright relative to Nicky Van Der Vekens Belgium Nicky Van Der Vekens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Nicky Van Der Vekens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Linda M. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Linda M. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda M. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda M. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Linda M. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda M. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda M. Wright. The network helps show where Linda M. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Linda M. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Linda M. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Linda M. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 199184
2 202038
3 201612
4 20185
5 20104
6 19903
7 20031
8 19951

About Linda M. Wright

Linda M. Wright is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Small Animals, Equine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 8 papers that have together received 148 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (3 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers), Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (2 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (2 papers) and Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (47 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (90 citations), Small Animals (28 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (63 citations) and Endocrinology (7 citations). Linda M. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Samih Lawand, Peter Gladstone, Robert J. Burns, M. Kristoffersen, Sarah M. Puchalski, Casper Lindegaard, Claus Thorn Ekstrøm, Thomas E. Fagan, John D. Strain and Sian Iles. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, The American Journal of Cardiology, Veterinary Surgery, Clinical Radiology and Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact