Lin Nga

928 citations
10 papers · 574 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Lin Nga

9 papers receiving 560 citations

Peers

Lin Nga
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 137
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 29
  • General Decision Sciences 31
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 278
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 184
Replace Sonja van Well with:
Sonja van Well Netherlands
Kaoru Nashiro United States
Zachary Yaple Singapore
Shin-ichi Suzuki Japan
Zachary P. Infantolino United States
Tobias Melcher Germany
Marc Bennett United Kingdom
Karin Erngrund Sweden
David Mathar Germany
Nicholas T. Van Dam Australia
Lin Nga relative to Sonja van Well Netherlands Sonja van Well's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Sonja van Well · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lin Nga

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lin Nga's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lin Nga with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lin Nga more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lin Nga

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lin Nga. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lin Nga. The network helps show where Lin Nga may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Lin Nga, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lin Nga Line = papers co-authored together Lin Nga links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2011198
2 2016176
3 201759
4 201356
5 201038
6 201214
7 201113
8 201311
9 20139
10
Gender differences in reward-related decision processing under stress. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 476-484.
20170

About Lin Nga

Lin Nga is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 10 papers that have together received 574 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (2 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (2 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (1 paper) and Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (137 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (29 citations), General Decision Sciences (31 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (278 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (184 citations). Lin Nga has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mara Mather, Michiko Sakaki, Tae‐Ho Lee, Julian F. Thayer, Hyun Joo Yoo, Nichole R. Lighthall, Sangeetha Somayajula, Eric Chen, Sarinnapha M. Vasunilashorn and Marissa A. Gorlick. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroreport, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, NeuroImage, Cognition & Emotion and Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact