Lies Mollet
Impact in
- Neurology top 2%
- Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
- Neurological disorders and treatments
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Papers in
- Neurology 10
- Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research 10
- Neurological disorders and treatments 2
-
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 5
- Co-authors
- Veerle De Herdt (8 shared papers)Kristl Vonck (10 shared papers)Alfred Meurs (10 shared papers)Paul Boon (10 shared papers)Robrecht Raedt (10 shared papers)Wytse J. Wadman (8 shared papers)Riëm El Tahry (8 shared papers)Evelien Carrette (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Neurochemistry (1 paper)International Journal of Neural Systems (1 paper)Neurotherapeutics (1 paper)Epilepsia (1 paper)Acta Physiologica (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlandsBulgaria
In The Last Decade
Lies Mollet
10 papers receiving 379 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Neurology 297
- Cognitive Neuroscience 156
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 102
- Neurology 58
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 56
Countries citing papers authored by Lies Mollet
This map shows the geographic impact of Lies Mollet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lies Mollet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lies Mollet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lies Mollet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lies Mollet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lies Mollet. The network helps show where Lies Mollet may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Lies Mollet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 213 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 69 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 25 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 14 | |
| 8 | Electrophysiological responses to vagus nerve stimulation in rats | 2011 | 5 |
| 9 | Anti-epileptic effects of vagus nerve stimulation in the focal pilocarpine model | 2009 | 1 |
| 10 | Anti-epileptic effects of vagus nerve stimulation in the focal pilocarpine model | 2009 | 1 |
About Lies Mollet
Lies Mollet is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 10 papers that have together received 383 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research (10 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (4 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers) and Epilepsy research and treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (297 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (156 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (102 citations), Neurology (58 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (56 citations). Lies Mollet has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Veerle De Herdt, Kristl Vonck, Alfred Meurs, Paul Boon, Robrecht Raedt, Wytse J. Wadman, Riëm El Tahry, Evelien Carrette, Tine Wyckhuys and Ilse Smolders. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurochemistry, International Journal of Neural Systems, Neurotherapeutics, Epilepsia and Acta Physiologica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.