Li‐Chia Chen

75 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Li‐Chia Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Family Practice 124
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 92
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 26
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 36
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 304
Replace Arja Helin‐Salmivaara with:
Arja Helin‐Salmivaara Finland
Adriana Ceci Italy
Véronique Rabenda Belgium
Sandra K. Willsie United States
Thomas Pullar United Kingdom
Victoria Rollason Switzerland
Julien Bezin France
Samuel Whittle Australia
Domenico Motola Italy
Hitomi Teramachi Japan
Li‐Chia Chen relative to Arja Helin‐Salmivaara Finland Arja Helin‐Salmivaara's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Arja Helin‐Salmivaara · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Li‐Chia Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Li‐Chia Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li‐Chia Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li‐Chia Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Li‐Chia Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li‐Chia Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li‐Chia Chen. The network helps show where Li‐Chia Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Li‐Chia Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Li‐Chia Chen Line = papers co-authored together Li‐Chia Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014181
2 201459
3 200757
4 200456
5 201345
6 200738
7 201737
8 200635
9 200734
10 201333
11 201933
12 200930
13 202030
14 200528
15 201523
16 200721
17 202221
18 201320
19 201519
20 202019

About Li‐Chia Chen

Li‐Chia Chen is a scholar working on Family Practice, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Complementary and alternative medicine, Pharmacology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (20 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (13 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (7 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (5 papers), Pharmacy and Medical Practices (4 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (3 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Reforms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (124 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (92 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (26 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (36 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (304 citations). Li‐Chia Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Taiwan and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Darren Mark Ashcroft, Roger Knaggs, Che Suraya Zin, Rachel Ann Elliott, Kwok‐Leung Cheung, Chao-Sung Chang, Yi‐Hsin Yang, Kun‐Pin Hsieh, Yaw‐Bin Huang and Fatiha Hana Shabaruddin. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, BMJ Open, Patient Preference and Adherence and International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact