Libo Yan

831 citations
68 papers · 529 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Libo Yan

59 papers receiving 505 citations

Peers

Libo Yan
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 16
  • Transportation 70
  • Marketing 92
  • Sociology and Political Science 303
  • Geography, Planning and Development 37
Replace Mengyuan Qiu with:
Mengyuan Qiu China
Naho Maruyama United States
Yongguang Zou China
Salamiah A. Jamal Malaysia
Marek Nowacki Poland
Brendan Canavan United Kingdom
Zoltán Bujdosó Hungary
Bo Wendy Gao Macao
Tamara Jovanović Serbia
Libo Yan relative to Mengyuan Qiu China Mengyuan Qiu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mengyuan Qiu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Libo Yan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Libo Yan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Libo Yan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Libo Yan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Libo Yan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Libo Yan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Libo Yan. The network helps show where Libo Yan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Libo Yan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Libo Yan Line = papers co-authored together Libo Yan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201769
2 202229
3 201829
4 201123
5 202022
6 201422
7 202121
8 201717
9 201717
10 201416
11 201815
12 202115
13 202015
14 202312
15 202012
16 201312
17 202012
18 202311
19 202011
20 202010

About Libo Yan

Libo Yan is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Marketing, Epidemiology, Social Psychology and Hepatology, having authored 68 papers that have together received 529 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research (24 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (10 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (9 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (7 papers), Hepatitis C virus research (6 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (5 papers) and Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (16 citations), Transportation (70 citations), Marketing (92 citations), Sociology and Political Science (303 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (37 citations). Libo Yan has collaborated with scholars based in Macao, China and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Jing Xu, Bo Wendy Gao, Zhang Meng, Stephen Pratt, Yong Zhou, Bob McKercher, Ye Xu, Zhen Sun, Hong Tang and Lingyao Du. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of China Tourism Research, Current Issues in Tourism, Tourism Management Perspectives, Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research and Journal Of Vacation Marketing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact