Liat Gantz

26 papers receiving 185 citations

Peers

Liat Gantz
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Ophthalmology 32
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 49
  • Epidemiology 65
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 35
  • Human-Computer Interaction 8
Replace Endri Angjeli with:
Endri Angjeli United States
Sangeetha Metlapally United States
Mhairi Day United Kingdom
María José Luque Cobija Spain
Katherine Spowart United Kingdom
Takahiro Niida Japan
Kelly A. Frantz United States
Shelley Hopkins Australia
Melissa Rice United States
Editha Ong United States
Liat Gantz relative to Endri Angjeli United States Endri Angjeli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Endri Angjeli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Liat Gantz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liat Gantz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liat Gantz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liat Gantz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liat Gantz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liat Gantz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liat Gantz. The network helps show where Liat Gantz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Liat Gantz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Liat Gantz Line = papers co-authored together Liat Gantz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200726
2 201823
3 202115
4 201314
5 201012
6 201111
7 201510
8 202210
9 20238
10 20208
11 20228
12 20218
13 20158
14 20186
15 20206
16 20193
17
Digital eye strain symptoms during online university learning in Israel and the USA during the COVID-19 pandemic
20212
18 20122
19 20222
20
Variation of Stereothreshold With Random-Dot Density
20082

About Liat Gantz

Liat Gantz is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 30 papers that have together received 190 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (9 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (7 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (2 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (2 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (2 papers) and Color Science and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (32 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (49 citations), Epidemiology (65 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (35 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (8 citations). Liat Gantz has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Harold E. Bedell, Hadas Stiebel‐Kalish, Einat Shneor, Ronald S. Harwerth, Susana T. L. Chung, Saumil S. Patel, Lluïsa Quevedo i Junyent, Ariela Gordon‐Shaag, David P. Piñero and Avi Caspi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Optometry, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, PLoS ONE, Vision Research and Clinical ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact