Liam Wright

1.6k citations
34 papers · 636 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Liam Wright

33 papers receiving 625 citations

Peers

Liam Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Modeling and Simulation 110
  • Health 149
  • Clinical Psychology 262
  • Applied Psychology 51
  • Microbiology 37
Replace Charlotte Robin with:
Charlotte Robin United Kingdom
Samantha R. Rosenthal United States
Irene A. Harmsen Netherlands
Abdulkarim Alrabiaah Saudi Arabia
Tiejian Feng China
Joseph Nelson Siewe Fodjo Belgium
Helen Perry United States
Marloes Bults Netherlands
Timothée Dub Finland
Allison Friedman United States
Liam Wright relative to Charlotte Robin United Kingdom Charlotte Robin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Charlotte Robin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Liam Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liam Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liam Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liam Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liam Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liam Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liam Wright. The network helps show where Liam Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Liam Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Liam Wright Line = papers co-authored together Liam Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020107
2 202185
3 202153
4 202147
5 202136
6 202134
7 202133
8 200733
9 200825
10 202222
11 202222
12 202022
13 200717
14 202214
15 202213
16 20239
17 20228
18 20238
19 20227
20 20177

About Liam Wright

Liam Wright is a scholar working on Health, Clinical Psychology, Modeling and Simulation, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 34 papers that have together received 636 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (11 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (10 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (6 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (5 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (3 papers) and Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (110 citations), Health (149 citations), Clinical Psychology (262 citations), Applied Psychology (51 citations) and Microbiology (37 citations). Liam Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Daisy Fancourt, Andrew Steptoe, David Bann, BG CORNEY, P. J. Blackall, Hei Wan Mak, H.N. Chinivasagam, Elise Paul, Neil M Davies and David Paton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, PLoS ONE, PLoS Genetics, Avian Pathology and eLife.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact