Liam P. Maher

1.2k citations
18 papers · 421 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Liam P. Maher

18 papers receiving 399 citations

Peers

Liam P. Maher
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 293
  • Gender Studies 50
  • Applied Psychology 27
  • Public Administration 18
  • Social Psychology 104
Replace Liping Gao with:
Liping Gao China
Wim van Breukelen Netherlands
Rhokeun Park South Korea
Melissa Chamberlin United States
Yunhui Xie China
Yongkang Yang China
Philip S. DeOrtentiis United States
Dana McDaniel Sumpter United States
Ilias Kapoutsis Greece
Renee de Reuver Netherlands
Liam P. Maher relative to Liping Gao China Liping Gao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Liping Gao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Liam P. Maher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liam P. Maher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liam P. Maher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liam P. Maher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liam P. Maher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liam P. Maher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liam P. Maher. The network helps show where Liam P. Maher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Liam P. Maher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Liam P. Maher Line = papers co-authored together Liam P. Maher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2019107
2 2020102
3 201855
4 201841
5 201627
6 202116
7 201716
8 202114
9 201613
10 201912
11 20234
12 20224
13 20243
14 20173
15 20221
16 20211
17 20211
18 20181

About Liam P. Maher

Liam P. Maher is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Gender Studies and Communication, having authored 18 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (11 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (2 papers) and Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (293 citations), Gender Studies (50 citations), Applied Psychology (27 citations), Public Administration (18 citations) and Social Psychology (104 citations). Liam P. Maher has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Pakistan and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gerald R. Ferris, Charn P. McAllister, B. Parker Ellen, Wayne A. Hochwarter, Samantha L. Jordan, Christopher C. Rosen, Jeremy D. Mackey, G. Alan Wang, Vickie Coleman Gallagher and Elena Lvina. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, Career Development International, Applied Psychology, International Business Review and Journal of Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact