Liam O’Sullivan

28 papers receiving 289 citations

Peers

Liam O’Sullivan
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 55
  • Development 12
  • Clinical Psychology 53
  • General Health Professions 51
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 3
Replace Chien Liu with:
Chien Liu United States
Mark Payne United Kingdom
Alicia Curtin United States
Frida Andersson Sweden
Karen Evans United States
Peter Campbell United Kingdom
Carmen Cirincione United States
Tessa Overmars‐Marx Netherlands
Emily Steel Australia
Jennifer Murray United Kingdom
Liam O’Sullivan relative to Chien Liu United States Chien Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Chien Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Liam O’Sullivan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liam O’Sullivan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liam O’Sullivan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liam O’Sullivan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liam O’Sullivan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liam O’Sullivan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liam O’Sullivan. The network helps show where Liam O’Sullivan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Liam O’Sullivan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Liam O’Sullivan Line = papers co-authored together Liam O’Sullivan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201878
2 202044
3 199233
4 201830
5 199328
6 199619
7 201414
8 201510
9
Health and well-being of family carers in Ireland: results of a survey of recipients of the carer’s allowance
200810
10 20208
11 20146
12 20056
13 19945
14
Family caring in Ireland
20105
15 20195
16 20174
17 20173
18 20132
19 19942
20 20142

About Liam O’Sullivan

Liam O’Sullivan is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, General Health Professions and Signal Processing, having authored 30 papers that have together received 323 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (5 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (3 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (3 papers), Music and Audio Processing (3 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (3 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (2 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (2 papers) and Advanced Vision and Imaging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (55 citations), Development (12 citations), Clinical Psychology (53 citations), General Health Professions (51 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (3 citations). Liam O’Sullivan has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Attracta Lafferty, Gerard Fealy, Éilish McAuliffe, Amanda Phelan, Diarmuid O’Shea, Emma Nicholson, Peter Corke, Julie Duncan, Micol Artom and Lorenzo Picinali. Their work appears in journals such as International Affairs, Pediatric Emergency Care, Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being, International Journal of Integrated Care and Age and Ageing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact