Liam Curren
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 10%
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research
Papers in
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 5
- Patient Dignity and Privacy 1
-
- Biomedical Ethics and Regulation 4
- Co-authors
- Jane Kaye (7 shared papers)Nadja Kanellopoulou (4 shared papers)David J. Lund (1 shared paper)Patrick L. Taylor (1 shared paper)Daniel G. MacArthur (1 shared paper)James Shepherd (1 shared paper)Deborah Mascalzoni (1 shared paper)Stefan Winter (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- European Journal of Health Law (2 papers)Biopreservation and Biobanking (1 paper)Medical Law Review (1 paper)European Journal of Human Genetics (1 paper)Nature Reviews Genetics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyBelgium
In The Last Decade
Liam Curren
7 papers receiving 331 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Health Informatics 15
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 214
- Genetics 115
- Physiology 104
- General Health Professions 74
Countries citing papers authored by Liam Curren
This map shows the geographic impact of Liam Curren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liam Curren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liam Curren more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Liam Curren
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liam Curren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liam Curren. The network helps show where Liam Curren may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Liam Curren, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 214 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 78 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 25 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 4 |
About Liam Curren
Liam Curren is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Political Science and International Relations, Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 7 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (5 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (4 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (1 paper), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper), Digital Mental Health Interventions (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (1 paper) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (15 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (214 citations), Genetics (115 citations), Physiology (104 citations) and General Health Professions (74 citations). Liam Curren has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Jane Kaye, Nadja Kanellopoulou, David J. Lund, Patrick L. Taylor, Daniel G. MacArthur, James Shepherd, Deborah Mascalzoni, Stefan Winter, Stephanie M. Fullerton and Nicholas Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Health Law, Biopreservation and Biobanking, Medical Law Review, European Journal of Human Genetics and Nature Reviews Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.