Liam Convie
Impact in
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
-
- Resilience and Mental Health
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
Papers in
- Surgery 4
- Esophageal and GI Pathology 2
-
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 2
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout 2
- Co-authors
- Mike Clarke (5 shared papers)Stephen Kirk (5 shared papers)Nicola McKinley (3 shared papers)William J. Campbell (2 shared papers)Scott McCain (4 shared papers)Martin Dempster (1 shared paper)W. J. Campbell (1 shared paper)Robert Kennedy (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMC Medical Ethics (2 papers)BMJ Open (1 paper)Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (1 paper)The Surgeon (1 paper)Trials (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandAustralia
In The Last Decade
Liam Convie
11 papers receiving 244 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- General Health Professions 156
- Clinical Psychology 92
- Emergency Medical Services 20
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 13
- Pharmacy 12
Countries citing papers authored by Liam Convie
This map shows the geographic impact of Liam Convie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liam Convie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liam Convie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Liam Convie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liam Convie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liam Convie. The network helps show where Liam Convie may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Liam Convie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 112 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 55 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 1 |
About Liam Convie
Liam Convie is a scholar working on Surgery, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 248 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Delphi Technique in Research (3 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (2 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (2 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers) and Resilience and Mental Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (156 citations), Clinical Psychology (92 citations), Emergency Medical Services (20 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (13 citations) and Pharmacy (12 citations). Liam Convie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mike Clarke, Stephen Kirk, Nicola McKinley, William J. Campbell, Scott McCain, Martin Dempster, W. J. Campbell, Robert Kennedy, W D B Clements and Jeffrey Campbell. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Medical Ethics, BMJ Open, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, The Surgeon and Trials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.