Lia Ring
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Resilience and Mental Health
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Health top 5%
- Health disparities and outcomes
Papers in
-
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research 7
- COVID-19 and Mental Health 7
- Migration, Health and Trauma 6
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health 4
- Resilience and Mental Health 3
-
- Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion 5
- Co-authors
- Yuval Palgi (9 shared papers)Yaakov Hoffman (5 shared papers)Shoshi Keisari (3 shared papers)Ehud Bodner (2 shared papers)Amit Shrira (2 shared papers)Sharon Avidor (2 shared papers)Sara Cohen-Fridel (1 shared paper)Yoav S. Bergman (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Lia Ring
18 papers receiving 545 citations
Lia Ring's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Clinical Psychology 394
- Health 150
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 26
- Applied Psychology 74
- Social Psychology 215
Countries citing papers authored by Lia Ring
This map shows the geographic impact of Lia Ring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lia Ring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lia Ring more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lia Ring
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lia Ring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lia Ring. The network helps show where Lia Ring may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Lia Ring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The loneliness pandemic: Loneliness and other concomitants of depression, anxiety and their comorbidity during the COVID-19 outbreak Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 404 |
| 2 | 2017 | 21 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2025 | 0 |
About Lia Ring
Lia Ring is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 555 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (7 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (7 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (6 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (5 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (3 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (3 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (394 citations), Health (150 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (26 citations), Applied Psychology (74 citations) and Social Psychology (215 citations). Lia Ring has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Canada and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Yuval Palgi, Yaakov Hoffman, Shoshi Keisari, Ehud Bodner, Amit Shrira, Sharon Avidor, Sara Cohen-Fridel, Yoav S. Bergman, Menachem Ben‐Ezra and Lee Greenblatt‐Kimron. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Research, Death Studies, Frontiers in Psychiatry, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease and Psychiatric Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.