Leu‐Wei Lo

84 papers receiving 4.5k citations

Peers

Leu‐Wei Lo
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Biomaterials 1.5k
  • Biomedical Engineering 2.0k
  • Materials Chemistry 1.6k
  • Bioengineering 187
  • Pharmaceutical Science 137
Replace Zhiliang Cheng with:
Zhiliang Cheng United States
Chung‐Shi Yang Taiwan
Xiuli Yue China
Ming Ma China
Holger Stephan Germany
Zhaogang Teng China
Sehoon Kim South Korea
Huizhen Jia China
Zhifei Dai China
Jie Yang China
Leu‐Wei Lo relative to Zhiliang Cheng United States Zhiliang Cheng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Zhiliang Cheng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leu‐Wei Lo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leu‐Wei Lo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leu‐Wei Lo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leu‐Wei Lo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leu‐Wei Lo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leu‐Wei Lo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leu‐Wei Lo. The network helps show where Leu‐Wei Lo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leu‐Wei Lo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leu‐Wei Lo Line = papers co-authored together Leu‐Wei Lo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010318
2 2010273
3 2008261
4 1996207
5 2009185
6 2008182
7 2010168
8 1996147
9 2020147
10 2003133
11 2009132
12 2012115
13 2009114
14 1999104
15 201198
16 199995
17 201294
18 200192
19 201987
20 200887

About Leu‐Wei Lo

Leu‐Wei Lo is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Biomaterials and Biophysics, having authored 85 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (35 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (26 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (12 papers), Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (10 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (10 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (9 papers), Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies (7 papers) and Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (1.5k citations), Biomedical Engineering (2.0k citations), Materials Chemistry (1.6k citations), Bioengineering (187 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (137 citations). Leu‐Wei Lo has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Chung‐Shi Yang, Shih‐Hsun Cheng, Chung‐Yuan Mou, Chia‐Hung Lee, Jeffrey S. Souris, Nai‐Tzu Chen, David F. Wilson, Chin-Tu Chen, Sergei A. Vinogradov and I‐Ping Huang. Their work appears in journals such as Advances in experimental medicine and biology, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Journal of Materials Chemistry, International Journal of Nanomedicine and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact