Leslie Lim

1.4k citations
53 papers · 882 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Leslie Lim

52 papers receiving 848 citations

Peers

Leslie Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Molecular Medicine 116
  • Biological Psychiatry 25
  • Clinical Psychology 158
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 103
  • Social Psychology 127
Replace Allen Lee with:
Allen Lee Hong Kong
Lijuan Jiang China
Isabelle Ingrand France
Hye‐Mi Noh South Korea
Li Zeng China
B. S. Srinath India
Shuai Liu China
Yong Jia China
Chan‐Young Kwon South Korea
Leslie Lim relative to Allen Lee Hong Kong Allen Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Allen Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leslie Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leslie Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leslie Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leslie Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leslie Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leslie Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leslie Lim. The network helps show where Leslie Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leslie Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leslie Lim Line = papers co-authored together Leslie Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006238
2 200565
3 199059
4 201157
5 200156
6 200543
7 201142
8 200833
9 200830
10 200421
11 199718
12 201515
13 200915
14 201914
15 201314
16 200713
17 201311
18
Why patients fail to attend psychiatric outpatient follow-up: a pilot study.
199510
19 20188
20 20138

About Leslie Lim

Leslie Lim is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 53 papers that have together received 882 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (10 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (10 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (7 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (5 papers), Sex work and related issues (4 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (4 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (116 citations), Biological Psychiatry (25 citations), Clinical Psychology (158 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (103 citations) and Social Psychology (127 citations). Leslie Lim has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tze Pin Ng, Ee Heok Kua, Theresa M. Lee, Hong-Choon Chua, Peak‐Chiang Chiam, Ho Leung Ng, Aizhen Jin, Calvin Fones, Yiong‐Huak Chan and Alexander Yaw Fui Chung. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine Science and the Law, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, JMIR Mental Health, Substance Use & Misuse and BMC Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact