Leslie Lim

52 papers receiving 897 citations

Peers

Leslie Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Molecular Medicine 121
  • Biological Psychiatry 26
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 56
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 80
  • Physiology 141
Replace Anlys Olivera with:
Anlys Olivera United States
Isabelle Ingrand France
Karen M. Kumor United States
Shuyan Zhang China
Allen Lee Hong Kong
Fahad S. Alshehri Saudi Arabia
Chan‐Young Kwon South Korea
B. S. Srinath India
Jung Yeon Lee United States
Jaclyn Cappell Canada
Leslie Lim relative to Anlys Olivera United States Anlys Olivera's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Anlys Olivera · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leslie Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leslie Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leslie Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leslie Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leslie Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leslie Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leslie Lim. The network helps show where Leslie Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leslie Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leslie Lim Line = papers co-authored together Leslie Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006275
2 200566
3 199062
4 201159
5 200157
6 201143
7 200543
8 200833
9 200832
10 200421
11 199718
12 201916
13 201516
14 200915
15 201314
16 201314
17 200713
18
Why patients fail to attend psychiatric outpatient follow-up: a pilot study.
199511
19 20188
20 20048

About Leslie Lim

Leslie Lim is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 55 papers that have together received 942 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (9 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (4 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (4 papers), Sex work and related issues (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (3 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (121 citations), Biological Psychiatry (26 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (56 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (80 citations) and Physiology (141 citations). Leslie Lim has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tze Pin Ng, Ee Heok Kua, Theresa M. Lee, Hong-Choon Chua, Peak‐Chiang Chiam, Ho Leung Ng, Aizhen Jin, Calvin Fones, Yiong‐Huak Chan and Christina Hall. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine Science and the Law, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, British Journal of Ophthalmology and Parkinsonism & Related Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact