Leslie E. C. Lim

55 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Leslie E. C. Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Molecular Medicine 121
  • Biological Psychiatry 36
  • Clinical Psychology 178
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 106
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 56
Replace Hwei Wuen Chan with:
Hwei Wuen Chan Singapore
Allen Ting Chun Lee Hong Kong
Isabelle Ingrand France
Yuqiong He China
Timothy J. Fairchild Australia
Felix C. V. Potocnik South Africa
Yong Jia China
Juan Peng China
Omar Gammoh Jordan
Chan-Young Kwon South Korea
Leslie E. C. Lim relative to Hwei Wuen Chan Singapore Hwei Wuen Chan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9×
Hwei Wuen Chan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leslie E. C. Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leslie E. C. Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leslie E. C. Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leslie E. C. Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leslie E. C. Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leslie E. C. Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leslie E. C. Lim. The network helps show where Leslie E. C. Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leslie E. C. Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leslie E. C. Lim Line = papers co-authored together Leslie E. C. Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006280
2 202289
3 200566
4 201164
5 200164
6 199062
7 202254
8 200545
9 201143
10 200834
11 200832
12 200421
13 199718
14 201917
15 201517
16 200916
17 201315
18 201314
19 200713
20
Trade, employment and industrialisation in Singapore
198613

About Leslie E. C. Lim

Leslie E. C. Lim is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (9 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (4 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (4 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (3 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Sex work and related issues (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (121 citations), Biological Psychiatry (36 citations), Clinical Psychology (178 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (106 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (56 citations). Leslie E. C. Lim has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tze Pin Ng, Ee Heok Kua, Theresa M. Lee, Hong-Choon Chua, Peak‐Chiang Chiam, Ho Leung Ng, Aizhen Jin, Yiong‐Huak Chan, Calvin S. L. Fones and Eng Fong Pang. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine Science and the Law, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and BJPsych Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact