Leo Ling
Impact in
- Neurology top 1%
- Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Sensory Systems top 1%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Papers in
- Neurology 31
- Vestibular and auditory disorders 31
-
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions 10
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 6
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 3
- Co-authors
- James O. Phillips (28 shared papers)Albert F. Fuchs (14 shared papers)Jay T. Rubinstein (16 shared papers)Kaibao Nie (13 shared papers)Amy Nowack (10 shared papers)C. Siebold (6 shared papers)Chris R. S. Kaneko (7 shared papers)Steven M. Bierer (8 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Neurophysiology (11 papers)Otology & Neurotology (5 papers)Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (3 papers)Hearing Research (2 papers)Neurotherapeutics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyRussia
In The Last Decade
Leo Ling
33 papers receiving 758 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Neurology 604
- Sensory Systems 293
- Cognitive Neuroscience 443
- Otorhinolaryngology 54
- Ophthalmology 82
Countries citing papers authored by Leo Ling
This map shows the geographic impact of Leo Ling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leo Ling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leo Ling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leo Ling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leo Ling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leo Ling. The network helps show where Leo Ling may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leo Ling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 105 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 63 | |
| 3 | 1992 | 60 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 58 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 54 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 43 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 29 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 27 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 25 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 25 | |
| 14 | 1996 | 23 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 21 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 13 |
About Leo Ling
Leo Ling is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Ophthalmology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 776 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vestibular and auditory disorders (31 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (15 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (10 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (9 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (3 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (604 citations), Sensory Systems (293 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (443 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (54 citations) and Ophthalmology (82 citations). Leo Ling has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Russia. Frequent co-authors include James O. Phillips, Albert F. Fuchs, Jay T. Rubinstein, Kaibao Nie, Amy Nowack, C. Siebold, Chris R. S. Kaneko, Steven M. Bierer, James J. Plorde and Christopher M. Phillips. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurophysiology, Otology & Neurotology, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Hearing Research and Neurotherapeutics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.