James W. Wolfe

992 citations
42 papers · 777 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

James W. Wolfe

41 papers receiving 510 citations

Peers

James W. Wolfe
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Neurology 449
  • Sensory Systems 88
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 333
  • Ophthalmology 93
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 182
Replace John S. Outerbridge with:
John S. Outerbridge Canada
Sidney M. Blair United States
G. Mandl Canada
J. C. Hwang Hong Kong
Ralph M. Jell Canada
Leslie P. Felpel United States
Aron Gonshor Canada
F. Harlay France
Barbara J. Winterson United States
J. Droulez France
James W. Wolfe relative to John S. Outerbridge Canada John S. Outerbridge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.5×
John S. Outerbridge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James W. Wolfe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James W. Wolfe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James W. Wolfe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James W. Wolfe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James W. Wolfe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James W. Wolfe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James W. Wolfe. The network helps show where James W. Wolfe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside James W. Wolfe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James W. Wolfe Line = papers co-authored together James W. Wolfe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1979112
2 198195
3 197770
4 198758
5 197850
6 197233
7 196730
8 197825
9 197124
10 198224
11 199322
12 198119
13 198818
14 198415
15 198115
16 199215
17 197814
18 196913
19
Evidence for control of nystagmic habituation by folium-tuber vermis and fastigial nuclei.
196812
20 196911

About James W. Wolfe

James W. Wolfe is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Ophthalmology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 42 papers that have together received 777 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vestibular and auditory disorders (21 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (8 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (5 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (5 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (4 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (449 citations), Sensory Systems (88 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (333 citations), Ophthalmology (93 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (182 citations). James W. Wolfe has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James E. Olson, J. M. R. Furman, Dennis P. O’Leary, John Denis Enderle, Edward J. Engelken, R. Llin�s, Joel F. Lubar, James R. Ison, John D. Rummel and Lee B. Kats. Their work appears in journals such as Physiology & Behavior, Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology, Experimental Neurology and Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact