Léa Nash

16 papers receiving 532 citations

Peers

Léa Nash
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 220
  • Language and Linguistics 170
  • Linguistics and Language 45
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 118
  • Pollution 69
Replace Jessica Love with:
Jessica Love United States
Anna Sáfár Netherlands
Jürgen Dittmann Germany
He Quan Sun Singapore
Lloyd Holliday Finland
Jeong‐Ah Shin South Korea
Hajime Ono Japan
Simona Montanari United States
Carl Grove United Kingdom
Fabian Heck Germany
Léa Nash relative to Jessica Love United States Jessica Love's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.9×
Jessica Love · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Léa Nash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Léa Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Léa Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Léa Nash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Léa Nash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Léa Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Léa Nash. The network helps show where Léa Nash may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Léa Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Léa Nash Line = papers co-authored together Léa Nash links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1994223
2 1998177
3 200166
4 201739
5 202125
6
The Internal Ergative Subject Hypothesis
199625
7 200215
8 198113
9 20177
10 20207
11 20112
12 20182
13
High and Higher Applicatives: The Case of French Non-core Datives *
20112
14 20211
15 20191
16 20161
17 20220

About Léa Nash

Léa Nash is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 606 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (7 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (5 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers), Language Development and Disorders (2 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (2 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (2 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (1 paper) and Lexicography and Language Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (220 citations), Language and Linguistics (170 citations), Linguistics and Language (45 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (118 citations) and Pollution (69 citations). Léa Nash has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Célia Jakubowicz, Sylvia A. Denome, Christopher J. Oldfield, Christophe‐Loïc Gérard, Alain Rouveret, G S Incefy, Karim Abu‐Omar, Antoinette Hatzfeld, Romeu Mendes and Gideon Goldstein. Their work appears in journals such as Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, Journal of Bacteriology, Brain and Language, Language Acquisition and The Journal of Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact