Laura‐Jane Smith

33 papers receiving 391 citations

Peers

Laura‐Jane Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Family Practice 14
  • Equine 13
  • Neurology 92
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 21
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 67
Replace Sonia Frick with:
Sonia Frick Switzerland
Ricardo Garcia Branco United Kingdom
Iván David Lozada-Martínez Colombia
Schwartz Cj United States
Cathy L. Greenfield United States
Bappa Adamu Nigeria
Reade A. Quinton United States
John Lawrenson South Africa
Ana Martín‐Ancel Spain
Gary Hankins United States
Laura‐Jane Smith relative to Sonia Frick Switzerland Sonia Frick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Sonia Frick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Laura‐Jane Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laura‐Jane Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura‐Jane Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura‐Jane Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laura‐Jane Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura‐Jane Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura‐Jane Smith. The network helps show where Laura‐Jane Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Laura‐Jane Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Laura‐Jane Smith Line = papers co-authored together Laura‐Jane Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020113
2 201734
3 199533
4 201428
5 201626
6 199123
7
Efficacy and tolerability of imipenem-cilastatin versus ceftazidime plus tobramycin as empiric therapy of presumed bacterial infection in neutropenic cancer patients.
199319
8 201518
9 202216
10 201313
11 195611
12 20158
13 20097
14 20096
15 20165
16 19965
17 20144
18 19984
19 20123
20 20233

About Laura‐Jane Smith

Laura‐Jane Smith is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Infectious Diseases and Oncology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 402 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate Change and Health Impacts (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (3 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (2 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (2 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (2 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (2 papers) and Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (14 citations), Equine (13 citations), Neurology (92 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (21 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (67 citations). Laura‐Jane Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Ukraine. Frequent co-authors include Alison Sturrock, S. Strobel, Sam Norton, M.J. Elliott, Jimstan Periselneris, Amit Patel, James Galloway, Surinder S. Birring, Elizabeth Moore and Patricia Macedo. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Medical Education, Thorax, BMJ, Environmental and Engineering Geoscience and Laboratory Investigation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact