Laura Schmid

533 citations
7 papers · 358 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

    • Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation 5
    • Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research 1
    • Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies 1
    • Evolution and Genetic Dynamics 4

Laura Schmid

7 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers

Laura Schmid
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Safety Research 134
  • Sociology and Political Science 326
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 61
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 61
  • Genetics 82
Replace Isamu Okada with:
Isamu Okada Japan
Ashley Harrell United States
Wulf Albers Germany
Kenju Kamei Japan
Johannes Lohse Germany
Matthias Cinyabuguma United States
John Thrasher United States
Francis A. Beer United States
Barry Mccrae Australia
Mariana Blanco Colombia
Laura Schmid relative to Isamu Okada Japan Isamu Okada's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Isamu Okada · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Laura Schmid

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laura Schmid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura Schmid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura Schmid more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laura Schmid

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura Schmid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura Schmid. The network helps show where Laura Schmid may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Laura Schmid, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Laura Schmid Line = papers co-authored together Laura Schmid links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

About Laura Schmid

Laura Schmid is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Genetics, Safety Research, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 7 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (5 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (4 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers), Housing Market and Economics (1 paper), Game Theory and Applications (1 paper), Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research (1 paper), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (1 paper) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (134 citations), Sociology and Political Science (326 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (61 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (61 citations) and Genetics (82 citations). Laura Schmid has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christian Hilbe, Krishnendu Chatterjee, Martin A. Nowak, Katrin Auspurg, Thomas Hinz and Josef Tkadlec. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Scientific Reports, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Housing Economics and PLoS Computational Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact