Laura E. Thomas

2k citations
65 papers · 1.5k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Laura E. Thomas

62 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Laura E. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 464
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 283
  • Human-Computer Interaction 88
  • Neurology 154
  • Automotive Engineering 82
Replace James Michael Hillis with:
James Michael Hillis United States
Ruth Seurinck Belgium
Michio Tanaka Japan
Luca Cecchetti Italy
Ilan Goldberg Israel
Reinhard J. Tomczak Germany
Pascal J. Kieslich Germany
Marika Urbanski France
Michael Peer Israel
A. Tosoni Italy
Laura E. Thomas relative to James Michael Hillis United States James Michael Hillis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.9×
James Michael Hillis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Laura E. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laura E. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura E. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura E. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laura E. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura E. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura E. Thomas. The network helps show where Laura E. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Laura E. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Laura E. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Laura E. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007159
2 2021117
3 200987
4 200667
5 200962
6 202161
7 201549
8 202246
9 202244
10 201241
11 201940
12 200636
13 200836
14 201027
15 201127
16 201526
17 201025
18 202325
19 201324
20 201724

About Laura E. Thomas

Laura E. Thomas is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Automotive Engineering, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (26 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (11 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (9 papers), Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (8 papers), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (7 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (6 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (5 papers) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (464 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (283 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (88 citations), Neurology (154 citations) and Automotive Engineering (82 citations). Laura E. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Alejandro Lleras, David Edmund Irwin, Meena Upadhyaya, D.N. Cooper, Adriane E. Seiffert, Daniel J. Simons, Arthur F. Kramer, Matthew E. Mort, Michael S. Ambinder and Brian R. Levinthal. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Attention Perception & Psychophysics, Frontiers in Psychology and Human Mutation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact