Laura Chambers

1.5k citations
92 papers · 1.0k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Laura Chambers

82 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Laura Chambers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 160
  • Reproductive Medicine 134
  • Health Informatics 24
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 35
  • Health 75
Replace Anshu P. Mohllajee with:
Anshu P. Mohllajee United States
Petra M. Casey United States
Jacques Balayla Canada
Maria Fernanda Gallo United States
Jennifer Fay Kawwass United States
Mads Kamper‐Jørgensen Denmark
Douglas Shenson United States
Manuella Epiney Switzerland
Andrea Lanes United States
Leyla Şahin United States
Laura Chambers relative to Anshu P. Mohllajee United States Anshu P. Mohllajee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×17.3×
Anshu P. Mohllajee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Laura Chambers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laura Chambers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura Chambers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura Chambers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laura Chambers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura Chambers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura Chambers. The network helps show where Laura Chambers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Laura Chambers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Laura Chambers Line = papers co-authored together Laura Chambers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993113
2 1993103
3 202289
4 201966
5 202144
6 202031
7 202128
8 202027
9 202026
10 201925
11 202124
12 201824
13 202023
14 202121
15 202018
16 202017
17 202015
18 202015
19 202014
20 202114

About Laura Chambers

Laura Chambers is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, Oncology and Microbiology, having authored 92 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (17 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (15 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (12 papers), Gut microbiota and health (9 papers), PARP inhibition in cancer therapy (5 papers), Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (4 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (3 papers) and Reproductive tract infections research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (160 citations), Reproductive Medicine (134 citations), Health Informatics (24 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (35 citations) and Health (75 citations). Laura Chambers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Joseph W. Lenz, Chad M. Michener, Roberto Vargas, Meng Yao, Wolfgang von der Linden, Peter Graham Rose, Wolfgang Linden, Robert L. Debernardo, Tommaso Falcone and Ofer Reizes. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact