Laura Bishop
Impact in
- Music top 1%
- Diverse Music Education Insights
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Papers in
-
- Neuroscience and Music Perception 28
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 5
-
- Action Observation and Synchronization 10
- Music Therapy and Health 4
- Co-authors
- Werner Goebl (10 shared papers)Freya Bailes (5 shared papers)Roger T. Dean (4 shared papers)Carlos Cancino-Chacón (1 shared paper)Bruno Laeng (6 shared papers)Alexander Refsum Jensenius (4 shared papers)Simon Høffding (4 shared papers)Catherine Stevens (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Laura Bishop
31 papers receiving 408 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Music 133
- Cognitive Neuroscience 324
- Social Psychology 182
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 99
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 125
Countries citing papers authored by Laura Bishop
This map shows the geographic impact of Laura Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura Bishop more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laura Bishop
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura Bishop. The network helps show where Laura Bishop may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Laura Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 58 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 54 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 49 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 6 |
About Laura Bishop
Laura Bishop is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Music, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 450 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (28 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (11 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (10 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (9 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (6 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Music and Audio Processing (4 papers) and Music Therapy and Health (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (133 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (324 citations), Social Psychology (182 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (99 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (125 citations). Laura Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Norway and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Werner Goebl, Freya Bailes, Roger T. Dean, Carlos Cancino-Chacón, Bruno Laeng, Alexander Refsum Jensenius, Simon Høffding, Catherine Stevens, Víctor González and Jonna K. Vuoskoski. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Music & Science, Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal, PLoS ONE and Psychology of Music.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.