L. Vaes

530 citations
21 papers · 348 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

L. Vaes

20 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers

L. Vaes
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 86
  • Surgery 303
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 115
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 61
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 25
Replace Ray V. Brizgys with:
Ray V. Brizgys United States
Neera Sah United States
M. Soetens Belgium
W. D. R. Writer Canada
Evan J. Goodman United States
Suzanne Huffnagle United States
C. L. Owen United States
Samyukta Singh Canada
Michael R. Hejtmanek United States
C. E. Ocampo Singapore
L. Vaes relative to Ray V. Brizgys United States Ray V. Brizgys's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Ray V. Brizgys · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L. Vaes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. Vaes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Vaes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Vaes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. Vaes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Vaes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Vaes. The network helps show where L. Vaes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside L. Vaes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L. Vaes Line = papers co-authored together L. Vaes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991125
2 197934
3 198733
4 198732
5 198824
6 198619
7 199212
8
Brachial plexus block.
198112
9 19849
10
Regional anesthesia: how safe? A review of 20,590 cases.
19888
11 19887
12 19866
13 19876
14 19865
15 19924
16 19844
17 19913
18 19883
19 19881
20 19871

About L. Vaes

L. Vaes is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 21 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (16 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (7 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (7 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (4 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (2 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Child Abuse and Related Trauma (2 papers) and Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (86 citations), Surgery (303 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (115 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (61 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (25 citations). L. Vaes has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Curacao and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include M. Soetens, A. Van Zundert, André van Zundert, Hugo Van Aken, A. Van Steenberge, Hugo Devlieger, Jan Vertommen, Andre De Wolf, Achiel L. Bleyaert and Paul van der Aa. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact