Jack van Kleef

15 papers receiving 380 citations

Peers

Jack van Kleef
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 150
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 153
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 46
  • Developmental Neuroscience 35
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 108
Replace I. C. W. Olievier with:
I. C. W. Olievier Netherlands
Salah A. Ismail Saudi Arabia
Aad Berkenbosch Netherlands
Elizabeth A. Hamber United States
Elif Başgül Türkiye
Timothy J. McCulloch Australia
Hiroaki Watanabe Japan
Shigeki Sakuraba Japan
Shunichi Takagi Japan
Andrea Podolsky Austria
Jack van Kleef relative to I. C. W. Olievier Netherlands I. C. W. Olievier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
I. C. W. Olievier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack van Kleef

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack van Kleef's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack van Kleef with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack van Kleef more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack van Kleef

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack van Kleef. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack van Kleef. The network helps show where Jack van Kleef may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jack van Kleef, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack van Kleef Line = papers co-authored together Jack van Kleef links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 200155
2 199650
3 201843
4 199739
5 199538
6 198335
7 198332
8 199631
9 198222
10 199521
11 200620
12 19966
13 19876
14 19803
15 19871

About Jack van Kleef

Jack van Kleef is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 15 papers that have together received 402 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (6 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (5 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (4 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (4 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers) and Thermal Regulation in Medicine (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (150 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (153 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (46 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (35 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (108 citations). Jack van Kleef has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Albert Dahan, Luc J. Teppema, Elise Sarton, Aad Berkenbosch, J. DeGoede, I. C. W. Olievier, Johan Spierdijk, Theodore H. Stanley, Simon de Lange and Diederik Nieuwenhuijs. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie and High Altitude Medicine & Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact