L. Pauer

1.4k citations
39 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

L. Pauer

39 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

L. Pauer
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 366
  • Physiology 362
  • Pharmacology 235
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 65
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 160
Replace Andrew Clair with:
Andrew Clair United States
Fujun Wang United States
U. Sharma United States
Emmanuel Bäckryd Sweden
George Mensing United States
Jay Kranzler United States
A. Rosen United States
Bernhard Frank United Kingdom
Thomas Toelle Germany
Liu Shui China
L. Pauer relative to Andrew Clair United States Andrew Clair's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Andrew Clair · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L. Pauer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. Pauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Pauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Pauer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. Pauer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Pauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Pauer. The network helps show where L. Pauer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside L. Pauer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L. Pauer Line = papers co-authored together L. Pauer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013213
2 2008158
3 2008103
4 2004100
5 201174
6 201639
7 201538
8 201333
9 201730
10 201729
11 201827
12 201726
13 201525
14 201423
15 201421
16 201521
17 201221
18 202119
19 201619
20 201717

About L. Pauer

L. Pauer is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Physiology, Economics and Econometrics and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (20 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (8 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper), Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research (1 paper) and Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (366 citations), Physiology (362 citations), Pharmacology (235 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (65 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (160 citations). L. Pauer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Linda LaMoreaux, Julio Rosenstock, Joseph C. Arezzo, Daniel J. Clauw, Ed Whalen, Richard E. Harris, Lesley M. Arnold, Johnson P. Hampson, Tobias Schmidt‐Wilcke and Krai Chatamra. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pain, Clinical Journal of Pain, European Psychiatry, Pain Medicine and Arthritis & Rheumatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact