L. Gil

1.2k citations
69 papers · 941 · h-index 19

Impact in

    • Sperm and Testicular Function
    • Ovarian function and disorders
  • Physiology top 2%
    • Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species

Papers in

L. Gil

62 papers receiving 910 citations

Peers

L. Gil
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Reproductive Medicine 609
  • Physiology 135
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 532
  • Equine 22
  • Insect Science 91
Replace Diego Bucci with:
Diego Bucci Italy
V. Medina Argentina
Marcella Spinaci Italy
Agnieszka Partyka Poland
Julie Baumber United States
Francisco E. Martín‐Cano Spain
João Diego de Agostini Losano Brazil
C.G. Gravance United States
Hossein Hassanpour Iran
Daniel de Souza Ramos Angrimani Brazil
L. Gil relative to Diego Bucci Italy Diego Bucci's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Diego Bucci · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L. Gil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. Gil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Gil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Gil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. Gil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Gil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Gil. The network helps show where L. Gil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside L. Gil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L. Gil Line = papers co-authored together L. Gil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201094
2 201157
3 201049
4 201447
5 199843
6 201438
7 201136
8 201433
9 201332
10 198327
11 201626
12 201425
13
Evaluation of high resin yielders of Pinus pinaster Ait.
200224
14 201423
15 201122
16 201522
17 201721
18 201421
19 199218
20 201316

About L. Gil

L. Gil is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Agronomy and Crop Science and Genetics, having authored 69 papers that have together received 941 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sperm and Testicular Function (42 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (36 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (10 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (9 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (8 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (6 papers), Seed Germination and Physiology (5 papers) and Bee Products Chemical Analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (609 citations), Physiology (135 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (532 citations), Equine (22 citations) and Insect Science (91 citations). L. Gil has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Venezuela and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Noelia González, Victoria Luño, Maite Olaciregui, Clara Malo, Ignacio de Blas, Francisco José Martínez Martínez, Emilio Espinosa, J. I. Martí, Juan Sahuquillo and Carmen Matás. Their work appears in journals such as Cryobiology, Reproduction in Domestic Animals, Andrologia, Veterinary Record and Animals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact