L. David Ritchie

2.4k citations
41 papers · 1.4k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

L. David Ritchie

39 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

L. David Ritchie
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 447
  • Social Psychology 631
  • Literature and Literary Theory 246
  • Language and Linguistics 212
  • Communication 121
Replace Sandra Metts with:
Sandra Metts United States
Justine Coupland United Kingdom
Alan Sillars United States
Jerome Neu United States
Kathryn Dindia United States
Paul L. Witt United States
Wendy Samter United States
Dale Hample United States
Kenneth N. Cissna United States
Kathrin Jonkmann Germany
L. David Ritchie relative to Sandra Metts United States Sandra Metts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Sandra Metts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L. David Ritchie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. David Ritchie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. David Ritchie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. David Ritchie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. David Ritchie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. David Ritchie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. David Ritchie. The network helps show where L. David Ritchie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside L. David Ritchie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L. David Ritchie Line = papers co-authored together L. David Ritchie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990382
2 1994235
3 1991155
4 200374
5 200560
6 201349
7 200649
8 200843
9 199737
10 200436
11 201027
12 201723
13 200322
14 200820
15 200919
16 201418
17 199116
18 200716
19 201512
20 200911

About L. David Ritchie

L. David Ritchie is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics and Philosophy, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (27 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (11 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (9 papers), Humor Studies and Applications (8 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (5 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (5 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (4 papers) and Communication in Education and Healthcare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (447 citations), Social Psychology (631 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (246 citations), Language and Linguistics (212 citations) and Communication (121 citations). L. David Ritchie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Romania. Frequent co-authors include Mary Anne Fitzpatrick, Lynne Cameron, Vincent Price, Min Zhu, Heinz Eulau, Cynthia‐Lou Coleman and Masami Nishishiba. Their work appears in journals such as Metaphor and Symbol, Communication Research, Journal of Communication, Journal of Language and Social Psychology and Humor - International Journal of Humor Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact