Kyle Smith
Impact in
Papers in
-
- Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer 4
- Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies 3
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 2
- Genetics 7
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment 7
- Co-authors
- Roukoz Chamoun (3 shared papers)Paul A. Northcott (12 shared papers)Rutsuko Ito (1 shared paper)Matthijs A. A. van der Meer (1 shared paper)Carien S. Lansink (1 shared paper)Pieter Voorn (1 shared paper)A. David Redish (1 shared paper)Ann M. Graybiel (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Neuro-Oncology (6 papers)Molecular Cancer Therapeutics (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)JMIR mhealth and uhealth (1 paper)Clinical Cancer Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Kyle Smith
23 papers receiving 583 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Genetics 179
- Neurology 98
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 106
- Cognitive Neuroscience 110
- Cancer Research 72
Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Smith. The network helps show where Kyle Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 159 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 78 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 46 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 35 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 31 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 1 |
About Kyle Smith
Kyle Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Surgery, Cancer Research and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 25 papers that have together received 587 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (4 papers), Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer (4 papers), Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies (3 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (3 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (2 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (179 citations), Neurology (98 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (106 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (110 citations) and Cancer Research (72 citations). Kyle Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Roukoz Chamoun, Paul A. Northcott, Rutsuko Ito, Matthijs A. A. van der Meer, Carien S. Lansink, Pieter Voorn, A. David Redish, Ann M. Graybiel, Joshua D. Berke and Cyriel M. A. Pennartz. Their work appears in journals such as Neuro-Oncology, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, Scientific Reports, JMIR mhealth and uhealth and Clinical Cancer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.