Kyle Singleton

18 papers receiving 396 citations

Peers

Kyle Singleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Genetics 123
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Modeling and Simulation 23
  • Cancer Research 55
  • Neurology 27
Replace Paula Whitmire with:
Paula Whitmire United States
Friederike Schmidt‐Graf Germany
Francis Newman United States
Michael Asger Andersen Denmark
Maral Adel Fahmideh United States
Noam Asna Israel
Andrew Lin United States
Sebastian Winter United States
Heather Leeper United States
Joud Hajjar United States
Kyle Singleton relative to Paula Whitmire United States Paula Whitmire's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Paula Whitmire · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Singleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Singleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Singleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Singleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Singleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Singleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Singleton. The network helps show where Kyle Singleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Singleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyle Singleton Line = papers co-authored together Kyle Singleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2019214
2 201962
3 201551
4 201920
5
Wireless data collection of self-administered surveys using tablet computers.
201112
6 20179
7 20208
8
Comparing predictive models of glioblastoma multiforme built using multi-institutional and local data sources.
20128
9 20236
10 20222
11 20242
12
Motivating the additional use of external validity: examining transportability in a model of glioblastoma multiforme.
20142
13 20201
14 20201
15 20171
16 20191
17 20211
18 20221

About Kyle Singleton

Kyle Singleton is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Genetics, Epidemiology, Artificial Intelligence and General Health Professions, having authored 18 papers that have together received 402 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (9 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (6 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Brain Tumor Detection and Classification (2 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (2 papers) and AI in cancer detection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (123 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations), Modeling and Simulation (23 citations), Cancer Research (55 citations) and Neurology (27 citations). Kyle Singleton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Kristin R. Swanson, Paula Whitmire, Albert H. Kim, Nicole M. Warrington, Joshua B. Rubin, Ningying Wu, Eduardo Carrasco, Jill S. Barnholtz‐Sloan, Justin D. Lathia and Michael E. Berens. Their work appears in journals such as Neuro-Oncology, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, Science Translational Medicine, Journal of Digital Imaging and npj Digital Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact