Kyle P. Edmonds

531 citations
37 papers · 302 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Kyle P. Edmonds

34 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

Kyle P. Edmonds
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 63
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 28
  • Family Practice 10
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 18
  • Gastroenterology 20
Replace Takuya Shinjo with:
Takuya Shinjo Japan
Pamela A. Foral United States
Robyn Drake United Kingdom
Paulo Reis-Pina Portugal
Fernanda Bono Fukushima Brazil
Ahsan Azhar United States
Cordt T. Kassner United States
Stacy Hall United States
Ryuichi Sekine Japan
Erin M. Timpe United States
Kyle P. Edmonds relative to Takuya Shinjo Japan Takuya Shinjo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Takuya Shinjo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle P. Edmonds

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle P. Edmonds's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle P. Edmonds with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle P. Edmonds more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle P. Edmonds

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle P. Edmonds. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle P. Edmonds. The network helps show where Kyle P. Edmonds may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyle P. Edmonds, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyle P. Edmonds Line = papers co-authored together Kyle P. Edmonds links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201738
2 201831
3 201525
4 201924
5 201423
6 201712
7 201811
8 201910
9 201910
10 201510
11 20199
12 20228
13 20178
14 20168
15 20207
16 20227
17 20187
18 20196
19 20186
20 20176

About Kyle P. Edmonds

Kyle P. Edmonds is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 37 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Opioid Use (14 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (9 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (6 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (5 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (4 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (4 papers) and Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (63 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (28 citations), Family Practice (10 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (18 citations) and Gastroenterology (20 citations). Kyle P. Edmonds has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Rabia S. Atayee, Laura E. Williams, Heidi N. Yeung, Chih Cheng Hsu, Kelly C. Lee, William M. Mitchell, Timothy Furnish, Raymond Wen, David Shaw and Jeremy Hirst. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Palliative Medicine, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Journal of Pain Research, Critical Care Nurse and Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact