David Shaw

54 papers receiving 2.0k citations

David Shaw's Hit Papers

Rigour in qualitative case-study research 2013 · 477 citations
4770+4+8Years since publication100200300400

Peers

David Shaw
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
  • Research and Theory 75
  • Urban Studies 202
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 29
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 85
  • General Health Professions 499
Replace Godfred O. Boateng with:
Godfred O. Boateng United States
David Hughes United Kingdom
Mariette Bengtsson Sweden
Allison Williams Canada
Debbie Cavers United Kingdom
Marie Withers Osmond United States
Maria Mayan Canada
Jan de Vries Ireland
Anna‐Maija Pietilä Finland
Kati Utriainen Finland
David Shaw relative to Godfred O. Boateng United States Godfred O. Boateng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Godfred O. Boateng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Shaw

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Shaw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Shaw

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Shaw. The network helps show where David Shaw may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Shaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Shaw Line = papers co-authored together David Shaw links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Rigour in qualitative case-study research
Hit paper breakdown →
2013477
2 2008365
3 2011117
4 201282
5 200064
6 201361
7 201756
8 201755
9 201352
10 200845
11 201843
12 200142
13 200440
14 201840
15 201139
16 200034
17 201630
18 201830
19 200729
20 200926

About David Shaw

David Shaw is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Surgery, having authored 57 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urbanization and City Planning (8 papers), Rural development and sustainability (7 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (6 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Nursing education and management (5 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (5 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (4 papers) and Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (75 citations), Urban Studies (202 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (29 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (85 citations) and General Health Professions (499 citations). David Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Catherine Houghton, Kathy Murphy, Dympna Casey, Olivier Sykes, Hui Cheng, Sue Latter, Paul Yerrell, Gavin J. Andrews, Eric Yeboah and T Osman. Their work appears in journals such as Planning Practice and Research, Nurse Education Today, International Planning Studies, Town Planning Review and Sustainability.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact