Kyle Nash
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Cultural Differences and Values
Papers in
-
- Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion 7
- Cultural Differences and Values 2
- Forgiveness and Related Behaviors 2
-
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 5
- Co-authors
- Ian McGregor (5 shared papers)Mike Prentice (2 shared papers)Matthew T. Gailliot (1 shared paper)Michael Inzlicht (1 shared paper)Kumar Yogeeswaran (2 shared papers)Daria Knoch (1 shared paper)Thomas Baumgärtner (1 shared paper)Thomas L. Davies (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (2 papers)Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (1 paper)Psychological Inquiry (1 paper)Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (1 paper)Journal of Social Issues (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaNew ZealandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Kyle Nash
11 papers receiving 307 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Applied Psychology 66
- Social Psychology 202
- Cognitive Neuroscience 100
- General Decision Sciences 7
- Computational Mathematics 2
Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Nash
This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Nash more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Nash
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Nash. The network helps show where Kyle Nash may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 74 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 61 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 40 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 4 |
About Kyle Nash
Kyle Nash is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (7 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers), Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (66 citations), Social Psychology (202 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (100 citations), General Decision Sciences (7 citations) and Computational Mathematics (2 citations). Kyle Nash has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ian McGregor, Mike Prentice, Matthew T. Gailliot, Michael Inzlicht, Kumar Yogeeswaran, Daria Knoch, Thomas Baumgärtner, Thomas L. Davies, James N. Kirkpatrick and Thomas P. Duffy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Psychological Inquiry, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience and Journal of Social Issues.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.