Kyle Mattes
Impact in
- Communication top 5%
- Social Media and Politics
-
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Papers in
-
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 7
- Media Influence and Politics 4
-
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior 6
- Co-authors
- David P. Redlawsk (8 shared papers)Caitlin Milazzo (2 shared papers)Michael Spezio (3 shared papers)R. Michael Alvarez (3 shared papers)Ralph Adolphs (2 shared papers)Hackjin Kim (2 shared papers)Matthew O. Jackson (1 shared paper)Laurent Mathevet (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Women Politics & Policy (2 papers)Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly (2 papers)Political Psychology (2 papers)Electoral Studies (1 paper)Political Behavior (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Kyle Mattes
19 papers receiving 407 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Communication 87
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 116
- Gender Studies 64
- Marketing 57
- Political Science and International Relations 149
Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Mattes
This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Mattes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Mattes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Mattes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Mattes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Mattes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Mattes. The network helps show where Kyle Mattes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Mattes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 74 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 64 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 59 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 40 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 1 |
About Kyle Mattes
Kyle Mattes is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Political Science and International Relations, Communication and Social Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 439 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (6 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (5 papers), Media Influence and Politics (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (87 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (116 citations), Gender Studies (64 citations), Marketing (57 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (149 citations). Kyle Mattes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include David P. Redlawsk, Caitlin Milazzo, Michael Spezio, R. Michael Alvarez, Ralph Adolphs, Hackjin Kim, Matthew O. Jackson, Laurent Mathevet, Alexander Todorov and Ira J. Roseman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Women Politics & Policy, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, Political Psychology, Electoral Studies and Political Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.