Kyle Levi

578 citations
6 papers · 149 · h-index 5

Impact in

    • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
    • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
    • Vibrio bacteria research studies

Papers in

Kyle Levi

5 papers receiving 146 citations

Peers

Kyle Levi
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Ecology 102
  • Endocrinology 19
  • Microbiology 14
  • Infectious Diseases 33
  • Molecular Biology 93
Replace James Creecy with:
James Creecy United States
Hagay Enav Israel
Andrew Day United Kingdom
Shaleni Singh United States
Christopher Turkington Ireland
Kangpeng Xiao China
Hans Peter Klenk Germany
Catherine M. Mageeney United States
Claire Cormie United Kingdom
Phil Huss United States
Kyle Levi relative to James Creecy United States James Creecy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
James Creecy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Levi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Levi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Levi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Levi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Levi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Levi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Levi. The network helps show where Kyle Levi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Levi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyle Levi Line = papers co-authored together Kyle Levi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 202073
2 201845
3 201712
4 201810
5 20209
6
Variants of the master area route Eastern Siberia – Pacific ocean oil pipeline: geological environmental assessment
20060

About Kyle Levi

Kyle Levi is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Computer Networks and Communications, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 6 papers that have together received 149 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (3 papers), Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (1 paper), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (1 paper), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (1 paper), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (1 paper), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (1 paper), Transgenic Plants and Applications (1 paper) and Coal and Coke Industries Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (102 citations), Endocrinology (19 citations), Microbiology (14 citations), Infectious Diseases (33 citations) and Molecular Biology (93 citations). Kyle Levi has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Forest Rohwer, Katelyn McNair, Robert A. Edwards, María Isabel Rojas, Sean Benler, Ana G. Cobián-Güemes, Juris A. Grasis, Lance Boling, Savannah E. Sanchez and Heather Maughan. Their work appears in journals such as Microbiome, mSystems, Gut Microbes, Meta Gene and RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact