James Creecy

438 citations
7 papers · 277 · h-index 4

Impact in

    • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
    • Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
    • Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Papers in

    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 2
    • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 2
    • Identification and Quantification in Food 2
    • Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies 2

James Creecy

7 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

James Creecy
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Ecology 106
  • Genetics 112
  • Endocrinology 18
  • Insect Science 41
  • Small Animals 22
Replace Thibaut Jombart with:
Thibaut Jombart United Kingdom
Jan Reinkensmeier Germany
Hans‐Henrik Stærfeldt Denmark
Thorsten Kloesges Germany
B. M. Fredrik Pettersson Sweden
Morgan Kirzinger Canada
J. Bruce United Kingdom
Sudip Sharma United States
Gregory R. Richards United States
Anne E. Plovanich‐Jones United States
James Creecy relative to Thibaut Jombart United Kingdom Thibaut Jombart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Thibaut Jombart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Creecy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Creecy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Creecy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Creecy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Creecy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Creecy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Creecy. The network helps show where James Creecy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside James Creecy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Creecy Line = papers co-authored together James Creecy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2014139
2 201469
3 201537
4 201727
5 20152
6 20212
7 20241

About James Creecy

James Creecy is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology, Genetics, Small Animals and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 7 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (2 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers), Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (2 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (2 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (1 paper), Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (1 paper), Mollusks and Parasites Studies (1 paper) and Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (106 citations), Genetics (112 citations), Endocrinology (18 citations), Insect Science (41 citations) and Small Animals (22 citations). James Creecy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Tyrrell Conway, Barry L. Wanner, Hirotada Mori, Jun Teramoto, Phillip San Miguel, Akira Ishihama, Tomohiro Shimada, Wayne D. Lord, William Caire and Frankie Thomas Sitam. Their work appears in journals such as Current Opinion in Microbiology, mBio, Emerging infectious diseases, Frontiers in Marine Science and Forensic science international. Genetics supplement series.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact