Kunio Doi

1.3k citations
16 papers · 939 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Kunio Doi

16 papers receiving 885 citations

Peers

Kunio Doi
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 568
  • Artificial Intelligence 610
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 272
  • Health Informatics 13
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 302
Replace Shih‐Chung B. Lo with:
Shih‐Chung B. Lo United States
Miguel Souto Spain
B. Wein Germany
Amal Farag United States
Zhimin Huo United States
Yading Yuan United States
Jeffrey W. Hoffmeister United States
Mathilde Marie Winkler Wille Denmark
Lena Costaridou Greece
N. K. Timofeeva Netherlands
Kunio Doi relative to Shih‐Chung B. Lo United States Shih‐Chung B. Lo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Shih‐Chung B. Lo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kunio Doi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kunio Doi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kunio Doi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kunio Doi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kunio Doi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kunio Doi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kunio Doi. The network helps show where Kunio Doi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Kunio Doi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kunio Doi Line = papers co-authored together Kunio Doi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1990274
2 1994111
3 1990103
4 199498
5 198970
6 199367
7 199249
8
Computer-aided diagnosis: development of automated schemes for quantitative analysis of radiographic images.
199234
9 200031
10 199125
11 199119
12 198818
13 199617
14 199013
15 19946
16 19894

About Kunio Doi

Kunio Doi is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Molecular Biology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 939 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 diagnosis using AI (6 papers), AI in cancer detection (6 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (5 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (3 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (2 papers), Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases (1 paper) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (568 citations), Artificial Intelligence (610 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (272 citations), Health Informatics (13 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (302 citations). Kunio Doi has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Heber MacMahon, Robert A. Schmidt, Maryellen L. Giger, F Yin, Carl J. Vyborny, Charles E. Metz, Shigehiko Katsuragawa, Heang‐Ping Chan, Kwok L. Lam and Shigeru Sanada. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Physics, Investigative Radiology, Clinics in Chest Medicine, Radiology and Journal of Digital Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact