KS Pieper

686 citations
8 papers · 478 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

KS Pieper

8 papers receiving 455 citations

Peers

KS Pieper
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 222
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 171
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 214
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 61
  • Surgery 125
Replace Vei-Vei Lee with:
Vei-Vei Lee United States
Takeji Saitoh Japan
Antonino Granatelli Italy
Dan Abramov Israel
J.P. van Kuijk Netherlands
Walter A. Parham United States
Amira Hassanein United States
Vellappillil Gangadharan United States
Rahimtoola Sh United States
Peter Chi Keung Lai China
KS Pieper relative to Vei-Vei Lee United States Vei-Vei Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Vei-Vei Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by KS Pieper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of KS Pieper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by KS Pieper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites KS Pieper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by KS Pieper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by KS Pieper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by KS Pieper. The network helps show where KS Pieper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside KS Pieper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with KS Pieper Line = papers co-authored together KS Pieper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2001223
2 1992194
3
Exercise radionuclide angiocardiography predicts cardiac death in patients with coronary artery disease.
199133
4 201014
5 20096
6
A comparison of clinical outcomes between Canadian and American patients after nonurgent coronary stenting.
20044
7 20183
8
Predictors of one-year mortality in high-risk patients with acute coronary syndromes: the SYNERGY trial one-year results
20061

About KS Pieper

KS Pieper is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 8 papers that have together received 478 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (2 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (1 paper), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (1 paper), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (1 paper) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (222 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (171 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (214 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (61 citations) and Surgery (125 citations). KS Pieper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Daniel B. Mark, Peter J. Conlon, Mark A. Little, C Martín, Rainer Schulz, Gerd Heusch, Brian D. Guth, Pryor Db, Coleman Re and Carolyn Bigelow. Their work appears in journals such as European Heart Journal, Circulation Research, Biostatistics, Kidney International and Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact