Biostatistics

1.3k papers and 62.3k indexed citations

About

The 1.3k papers published in Biostatistics in the last decades have received a total of 62.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Biostatistics usually cover Statistics and Probability (733 papers), Molecular Biology (297 papers) and Genetics (210 papers) specifically the topics of Statistical Methods and Inference (446 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (379 papers) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (277 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biostatistics are Rafael A. Irizarry, Trevor Hastie, W. Evan Johnson, Cheng Li, Robert Tibshirani, Jerome H. Friedman, Geert Molenberghs, Robert K. Henderson, Robert Tibshirani and Matthew Stephens.

In The Last Decade

Biostatistics

1.2k papers receiving 60.8k citations

Fields of papers published in Biostatistics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biostatistics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biostatistics.

Countries where authors publish in Biostatistics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biostatistics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biostatistics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biostatistics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026