Nathan Dwyer

1.6k citations
44 papers · 595 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Dwyer

39 papers receiving 582 citations

Peers

Nathan Dwyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 338
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 221
  • Internal Medicine 18
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 18
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 66
Replace Gijs Geskes with:
Gijs Geskes Netherlands
Masahiko Onoe Japan
Paul S. Massimiano United States
John Kneeshaw United Kingdom
Peter Haldenwang Germany
Philippe Buffet France
Mehrnoush Toufan Iran
Yoshiki Motoji Japan
V. Gangadharan United States
Wim-Jan van Boven Netherlands
Nathan Dwyer relative to Gijs Geskes Netherlands Gijs Geskes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Gijs Geskes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Dwyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Dwyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Dwyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Dwyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Dwyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Dwyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Dwyer. The network helps show where Nathan Dwyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Dwyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Dwyer Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Dwyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201646
2 201940
3 202035
4 201334
5 201634
6 201830
7 201725
8 201724
9 202024
10 201823
11 201823
12 201821
13 201720
14 201720
15 201419
16 201617
17 201117
18 202015
19 201015
20 201714

About Nathan Dwyer

Nathan Dwyer is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Genetics, having authored 44 papers that have together received 595 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (14 papers), Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (14 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (8 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (6 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (5 papers), Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (4 papers), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (3 papers) and Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (338 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (221 citations), Internal Medicine (18 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (18 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (66 citations). Nathan Dwyer has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Thomas H. Marwick, Leah Wright, Dean S. Picone, Martin G. Schultz, J. Andrew Black, Philip Roberts‐Thomson, James E. Sharman, David S. Celermajer, D Kilpatrick and Matthew K. Armstrong. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Hypertension, Hypertension, Hypertension Research, CHEST Journal and Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact