Koen Van Boxem

1.4k citations
30 papers · 728 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Koen Van Boxem

29 papers receiving 714 citations

Peers

Koen Van Boxem
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 124
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 286
  • Pharmacology 160
  • Surgery 164
  • Physiology 88
Replace Sudhir Diwan with:
Sudhir Diwan United States
Jos W.M. Geurts Netherlands
Yeon-Dong Kim South Korea
Jason S. Lipetz United States
Mitchell K. Freedman United States
Jayantilal Govind Australia
İdil Tekin Türkiye
Kevin Pauza United States
David E. Jamison United States
Michael Saginur Canada
Koen Van Boxem relative to Sudhir Diwan United States Sudhir Diwan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Sudhir Diwan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Koen Van Boxem

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Koen Van Boxem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Koen Van Boxem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Koen Van Boxem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Koen Van Boxem

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Koen Van Boxem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Koen Van Boxem. The network helps show where Koen Van Boxem may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Koen Van Boxem, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Koen Van Boxem Line = papers co-authored together Koen Van Boxem links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010132
2 201786
3 200879
4 201466
5 201853
6 201546
7 201138
8 201935
9 202323
10 199821
11 202321
12 201620
13 201815
14 202314
15 201012
16 202110
17 20239
18 20249
19 20186
20 20245

About Koen Van Boxem

Koen Van Boxem is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Pharmacology, Cell Biology and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 30 papers that have together received 728 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (10 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (3 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (2 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (2 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (124 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (286 citations), Pharmacology (160 citations), Surgery (164 citations) and Physiology (88 citations). Koen Van Boxem has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jan Van Zundert, Maarten van Kleef, Jacob Patijn, Jianguo Cheng, Arno Lataster, Jan Willem Kallewaard, Nagy Mekhail, Nelleke de Meij, Kris Vissers and Maarten van Eerd. Their work appears in journals such as Pain Practice, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, Pain Medicine, Pain Research and Management and European Spine Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact