Klaus‐Peter Ossenkopp

216 papers receiving 7.6k citations

Peers

Klaus‐Peter Ossenkopp
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 1.3k
  • Biological Psychiatry 486
  • Biophysics 1.2k
  • Sensory Systems 732
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.4k
Replace Martin Kavaliers with:
Martin Kavaliers Canada
M. Geffard France
Elena Choleris Canada
Rolf Sprengel Germany
Rae Silver United States
Enrico Alleva Italy
Jeffery L. Barker United States
Bong‐Kiun Kaang South Korea
Gregory M. Brown Canada
Minmin Luo China
Klaus‐Peter Ossenkopp relative to Martin Kavaliers Canada Martin Kavaliers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Martin Kavaliers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Klaus‐Peter Ossenkopp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Klaus‐Peter Ossenkopp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Klaus‐Peter Ossenkopp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Klaus‐Peter Ossenkopp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Klaus‐Peter Ossenkopp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Klaus‐Peter Ossenkopp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Klaus‐Peter Ossenkopp. The network helps show where Klaus‐Peter Ossenkopp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Klaus‐Peter Ossenkopp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Klaus‐Peter Ossenkopp Line = papers co-authored together Klaus‐Peter Ossenkopp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 217 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006413
2 2010306
3 1996214
4 1995201
5 1996196
6 2008177
7 1996157
8 1994147
9 2008129
10 2014115
11 1995106
12 1998105
13
Measuring movement and locomotion : from invertebrates to humans
1996104
14 2008100
15 201498
16 199786
17 201484
18 199678
19 199778
20 198678

About Klaus‐Peter Ossenkopp

Klaus‐Peter Ossenkopp is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience and Biophysics, having authored 217 papers that have together received 7.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (50 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (38 papers), Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects (38 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (36 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (30 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (26 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (22 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (1.3k citations), Biological Psychiatry (486 citations), Biophysics (1.2k citations), Sensory Systems (732 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (2.4k citations). Klaus‐Peter Ossenkopp has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Martin Kavaliers, Derrick F. MacFabe, Tara S. Perrot-Sinal, Donald P. Cain, Liisa A.M. Galea, Lisa A. Eckel, Frank S. Prato, Francis Boon, Kelly A. Foley and Shelley K. Cross-Mellor. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioural Brain Research, Physiology & Behavior, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, Brain Research and Behavioral Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact