Klaus E. Appel

2.9k citations
46 papers · 2.4k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Klaus E. Appel

45 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Klaus E. Appel
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 468
  • Cancer Research 361
  • Biochemistry 150
  • Food Science 424
  • Biochemistry 118
Replace James Winfred Bridges with:
James Winfred Bridges United Kingdom
Bas J. Blaauboer Netherlands
John Doull United States
Jay I. Goodman United States
P. David Josephy Canada
Albrecht Seidel Germany
Tsuneo Kada Japan
David W. Potter United States
Werner K. Lutz Switzerland
José Rueff Portugal
Klaus E. Appel relative to James Winfred Bridges United Kingdom James Winfred Bridges's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
James Winfred Bridges · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Klaus E. Appel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Klaus E. Appel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Klaus E. Appel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Klaus E. Appel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Klaus E. Appel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Klaus E. Appel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Klaus E. Appel. The network helps show where Klaus E. Appel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Klaus E. Appel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Klaus E. Appel Line = papers co-authored together Klaus E. Appel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011270
2 2004169
3 2011166
4 2012150
5 2011136
6 2011131
7 2010104
8 200497
9 201381
10 201371
11 199066
12 200563
13 200863
14 200858
15 200948
16 200647
17 201345
18 201345
19 196443
20 199441

About Klaus E. Appel

Klaus E. Appel is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Biochemistry and Food Science, having authored 46 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (10 papers), Sulfur Compounds in Biology (7 papers), Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry (5 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (5 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (5 papers), Potato Plant Research (5 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (4 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (468 citations), Cancer Research (361 citations), Biochemistry (150 citations), Food Science (424 citations) and Biochemistry (118 citations). Klaus E. Appel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alfonso Lampen, Klaus Abraham, Nadiya Bakhiya, Susanne Andres, Rainer Gürtler, Katharina Berg, Gerhard Heinemeyer, Edith Berger‐Preiß, Michael Schwarz and Richard Palavinskas. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Toxicology, Toxicology Letters, Carcinogenesis, International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health and Toxicology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact