Kl. Schäfer

424 citations
47 papers · 312 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Kl. Schäfer

40 papers receiving 267 citations

Peers

Kl. Schäfer
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 44
  • Filtration and Separation 11
  • Organic Chemistry 84
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 25
  • Biomedical Engineering 113
Replace H. F. Stimson with:
H. F. Stimson United States
J. Powling India
J.G. Blok Netherlands
I. K. Yudin Russia
Jianfeng Lou China
K. E. Bett United Kingdom
Jacques Moreau France
Cristina Garza Mexico
D. A. MacInnes United Kingdom
Jean Timmermans United States
Kl. Schäfer relative to H. F. Stimson United States H. F. Stimson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
H. F. Stimson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kl. Schäfer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kl. Schäfer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kl. Schäfer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kl. Schäfer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kl. Schäfer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kl. Schäfer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kl. Schäfer. The network helps show where Kl. Schäfer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Kl. Schäfer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kl. Schäfer Line = papers co-authored together Kl. Schäfer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195255
2 197148
3 197532
4 195231
5 196830
6 195710
7 197010
8 197410
9 19766
10 19736
11 19586
12 19656
13 19595
14 19594
15 19564
16 19684
17 19643
18 19623
19 19783
20 19703

About Kl. Schäfer

Kl. Schäfer is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 47 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (11 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (9 papers), History and advancements in chemistry (7 papers), Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (4 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (4 papers), Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (3 papers) and Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (44 citations), Filtration and Separation (11 citations), Organic Chemistry (84 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (25 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (113 citations). Kl. Schäfer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include B. Schramm, R. N. Lichtenthaler, K. Hafner, Alan Davison, G. Wittig, Michael Dewar, E. Heilbronner, H.‐G. Ludwig, K. Strein and Martin Klingenberg. Their work appears in journals such as Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für physikalische Chemie, Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A, Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English and Zeitschrift für Elektrochemie Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für physikalische Chemie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact