K.L. Dhar
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Piperaceae Chemical and Biological Studies
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae
Papers in
- Pharmacology 19
- Piperaceae Chemical and Biological Studies 17
-
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 4
- Bioactive Natural Diterpenoids Research 3
- Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis 3
- Co-authors
- C.K. Atal (19 shared papers)Subhash C. Taneja (7 shared papers)Saroj Koul (4 shared papers)Jaswant Singh (3 shared papers)R. K. Thappa (6 shared papers)Opender Koul (1 shared paper)Anil Kumar Tripathi (1 shared paper)Sanjay V. Malhotra (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Phytochemistry (18 papers)Planta Medica (4 papers)Journal of Natural Products (2 papers)Tetrahedron Letters (2 papers)Tetrahedron (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- India
In The Last Decade
K.L. Dhar
36 papers receiving 552 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Pharmacology 221
- Biochemistry 129
- Food Science 102
- Complementary and alternative medicine 42
- Molecular Biology 313
Countries citing papers authored by K.L. Dhar
This map shows the geographic impact of K.L. Dhar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K.L. Dhar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K.L. Dhar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by K.L. Dhar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K.L. Dhar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K.L. Dhar. The network helps show where K.L. Dhar may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside K.L. Dhar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 78 | |
| 2 | The chemistry of Indian Piper species. | 1975 | 51 |
| 3 | 1980 | 47 | |
| 4 | 1983 | 46 | |
| 5 | 1989 | 28 | |
| 6 | 1970 | 28 | |
| 7 | 1983 | 27 | |
| 8 | 1976 | 25 | |
| 9 | 1979 | 24 | |
| 10 | 1988 | 23 | |
| 11 | 1987 | 20 | |
| 12 | 1969 | 19 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 19 | |
| 14 | 1970 | 18 | |
| 15 | 1980 | 15 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 13 | |
| 17 | 1973 | 11 | |
| 18 | 1984 | 11 | |
| 19 | 1986 | 10 | |
| 20 | 1974 | 10 |
About K.L. Dhar
K.L. Dhar is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Food Science and Plant Science, having authored 37 papers that have together received 609 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Piperaceae Chemical and Biological Studies (17 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (8 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (5 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (4 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (4 papers), Bioactive Natural Diterpenoids Research (3 papers), Biochemical and biochemical processes (3 papers) and Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (221 citations), Biochemistry (129 citations), Food Science (102 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (42 citations) and Molecular Biology (313 citations). K.L. Dhar has collaborated with scholars based in India. Frequent co-authors include C.K. Atal, Subhash C. Taneja, Saroj Koul, Jaswant Singh, R. K. Thappa, Opender Koul, Anil Kumar Tripathi, Sanjay V. Malhotra, Andrew Pelter and P. Pushpangadan. Their work appears in journals such as Phytochemistry, Planta Medica, Journal of Natural Products, Tetrahedron Letters and Tetrahedron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.